Industry Vocabulary Reference
Higher Education
Higher education fields describe admissions, learning activities, student support, financial aid, records, and accessibility workflows. Select the fields relevant to the decision being recorded.
Back to industry coverage library
This page shows selected examples and categories. Download the JSON for the complete vocabulary, including every field, permitted value, and policy pattern in this catalog.
How to use this reference
- Start with the core file if you need the cross-industry governance baseline.
- Choose an industry file for its workflow fields and permitted values.
- Match the OTel attributes to the policy paths your rules use, then verify the recorded fields in a test session.
Catalog context
For an admissions or student-support workflow, record the decision stage and review outcome. Avoid copying student records into traces when metadata is sufficient.
Risk note: Assess privacy, accessibility, and decision-review requirements for the institution and intended use. A student's location alone does not determine every applicable obligation.
Vocabulary file
- Download filename: 07_vertical_higher_education.json
- Kind: vertical
OTel namespaces
Referenced standards
These references explain the catalog's context. A listed standard does not establish that a configured application meets its requirements.
- CEDS v12, Common Education Data Standards (US Department of Education, 2024)
- IMS Global LTI Advantage 1.3, Learning Tools Interoperability (1EdTech Consortium)
- IMS Global Assignment and Grade Services (AGS) 2.0, LTI Advantage extension
- IMS Global Caliper Analytics v1.2, Learning activity telemetry standard
- IMS Global Open Badges v3.0, Digital credential standard
- FERPA, Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (20 USC 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99)
- COPPA, Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (13 and under; relevant for dual-enrollment)
- ADA Title II / Section 504, Accessibility obligations for higher education institutions
- WCAG 2.2, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (applicable to AI-generated content)
- EU AI Act (2024/1689) Annex III para 3, High-risk AI in education and vocational training
- EU GDPR (2016/679), Applicable to EU student data; FERPA equivalent for EU institutions
- Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200, Federal award administration (grants and contracts)
- Higher Education Act (HEA) Title IV, Federal student aid eligibility and reporting
- FSA (Federal Student Aid) COD, Common Origination and Disbursement system schemas
- IPEDS, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (NCES mandatory reporting)
- National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), Enrollment verification and transfer data
- PESC, Postsecondary Electronic Standards Council, EDI standards for transcripts, financial aid
- Common App, Undergraduate admissions data exchange standard
- QM (Quality Matters) Rubric v7, Online course quality standards
- HLC / SACSCOC / MSCHE / WASC / NWCCU, Regional accreditation standards (AI use disclosure)
Source references
- https://ceds.ed.gov/
- https://www.1edtech.org/standards/lti
- https://www.imsglobal.org/spec/lti-ags/v2p0
- https://www.imsglobal.org/spec/caliper/v1p2
- https://studentprivacy.ed.gov/ferpa
- https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-2/subtitle-A/chapter-II/part-200
- https://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/fsa/
- https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/
Subdomains
| Subdomain | Categories | Sample attributes |
|---|---|---|
| Student Success & Early Alert | 3 | education.student.success_risk_level, education.early_alert.trigger_category, education.intervention.outcome |
| Admissions & Enrollment Management | 4 | education.admission.consideration_level, education.admission.decision_type, education.enrollment.funnel_stage |
| Learning Activity & Assessment (LTI / AGS) | 4 | education.activity.status, education.activity.grading_progress, education.caliper.event_type |
| Academic Integrity & AI-Assisted Work | 2 | education.ai_integrity.flag, education.ai_integrity.disclosure_requirement |
| Financial Aid & Federal Grants | 3 | education.grant.lifecycle_status, education.financial_aid.sap_status, education.financial_aid.award_type |
| Student Records, Privacy & FERPA | 2 | education.ferpa.disclosure_exception, education.student_record.access_type |
| Accessibility, Accommodation & Inclusive Design | 2 | education.accommodation.status, education.ai_content.accessibility_status |
| Institutional Research & Accreditation Reporting | 2 | education.ipeds.survey_status, education.accreditation.ai_use_level |
Implementation examples
- Student Success & Early Alert: Student Success Risk Level. AI student success agent computes risk level nightly from LMS engagement, grade data, and attendance. Advisors receive daily caseload sorted by risk level. OPA policy requires that 'high_risk' students cannot have their risk score used for adverse actions (e.g. scholarship removal) without human review and student notification. (Eu AI Act Annex3 3b: EU AI Act Annex III para 3(b), High-risk AI: systems that assess or evaluate students. Requires human oversight, logging, transparency disclosure to students, and conformity assessment.)
- Student Success & Early Alert: Early Alert Trigger Category. Every early alert generated by the AI student success agent is tagged with its trigger category. This enables advisors to prioritise outreach type and ensures students can request explanation of why they received an alert. (Eu AI Act Art13: EU AI Act Article 13, Transparency: students must receive meaningful information about which trigger categories drove their AI risk assessment)
- Student Success & Early Alert: Intervention Outcome. AI success agent closes the intervention loop by recording outcome when the semester ends or the student's status changes. Outcome data feeds back into the AI risk model training pipeline, subject to FERPA deidentification requirements before model training use.
- Admissions & Enrollment Management: Admission Consideration Level. AI admissions screening agent references consideration level for each factor (test scores, GPA, essays, extracurriculars) to correctly weight its evaluation. 'Required' factors cannot be waived by the AI, missing required data must trigger human review, not a default score imputation.
Control ideas
These patterns describe possible controls, not active rules. Confirm applicability, implement the control, and test its effect on the application.
Require human review before denying admission
Hold a proposed admissions denial for an admissions officer. This institutional rule keeps the decision from being issued until review is recorded.
Regulatory basis: Institution-defined review control. EU AI Act Annex III 3(a) and Article 14 provide context for covered high-risk admissions systems.
Enforce ferpa vendor disclosure gate
Block any AI agent from transmitting individual student education records to a third-party vendor system unless a valid FERPA exception is logged and the vendor is registered as a school official with legitimate educational interest in the current FERPA annual notice.
Regulatory basis: FERPA 34 CFR 99.31, Permissible disclosures without consent; 34 CFR 99.32, Recordkeeping for disclosures; 34 CFR 99.7, Annual notification requirements for school official exception
Enforce before the action
Pass the request and your business action to this function. The core SDK checks policy before the action runs and again before its result is released. A deny or review decision means the action never runs.
import { Veriproof } from '@veriproof/sdk-core';
import type { GovernedResult, IndustryFact, JsonValue } from '@veriproof/sdk-core';
const veriproof = Veriproof.fromEnv();
export async function runProtectedAction<TInput extends JsonValue, TValue>(
request: TInput,
action: (input: TInput, signal: AbortSignal) => Promise<TValue>,
): Promise<GovernedResult<TValue, TInput>> {
// Catalog values for this vertical. Replace them with facts from the current workflow.
const industry: IndustryFact[] = [
{ attribute: "education.student.success_risk_level", policyInput: "education_student_success_risk_level", value: "on_track" },
{ attribute: "education.early_alert.trigger_category", policyInput: "education_early_alert_trigger_category", value: "attendance_absence_threshold" },
{ attribute: "education.intervention.outcome", policyInput: "education_intervention_outcome", value: "student_engaged_retained" },
];
// Policy runs before action() and again before the result is released.
// A deny or review decision means action() never runs.
return veriproof.govern(
"higher.education.evaluate",
request,
({ input, signal }) => action(input, signal),
{ industry },
);
}- Replace the sample values with facts from the current workflow. Rules read them under
input.snapshot.industry. - Test both permitted and blocked actions. Confirm that a blocked action never reaches your business function.
- Only
completed,completed_with_warning, andtransformedresults carry a released value.
For review decisions, follow the Human Review guide to configure continuation. Observe remains available when you need to record activity without enforcing a decision.
Set up the Higher Education example. See the API reference for TypeScript, Python, or .NET.
Try a simulator to see a governed decision in context. To connect your own workflow, verify your work email and start Developer free for 60 days. You can also review the relevant controls with our team.
Live demo → Start free for 60 days → Request coverage workshop →
Selected vocabulary categories
StudentSuccessRiskLevel
AI-assessed student academic success risk level per CEDS v12 StudentSuccessRiskLevel element. This is a high-risk AI output under EU AI Act Annex III para 3(b). Every AI risk score must include the triggering indicators and be available for student review under EU AI Act Article 13 transparency and FERPA access rights.
Workflow area: Student Success & Early Alert
- OTel attribute
education.student.success_risk_level- Permitted values
on_trackmonitorat_riskhigh_riskintervention_active
EarlyAlertTriggerCategory
Category of signal that triggered an AI early alert for a student. Logged for EU AI Act Article 13 transparency, students and advisors must be able to understand why an alert was generated.
Workflow area: Student Success & Early Alert
- OTel attribute
education.early_alert.trigger_category- First 8 permitted values
attendance_absence_thresholdassignment_missing_thresholdgrade_decline_trajectorylms_engagement_dropcourse_access_cessationfinancial_hold_placedwithdrawal_intent_signalregistration_not_completed
InterventionOutcome
Outcome of a student success intervention initiated by or escalated from an AI early alert system. Used to close the feedback loop for AI model improvement and institutional reporting.
Workflow area: Student Success & Early Alert
- OTel attribute
education.intervention.outcome- First 8 permitted values
student_engaged_retainedstudent_engaged_academic_improvementstudent_engaged_no_changestudent_withdrew_voluntarystudent_withdrew_academic_dismissalstudent_transferredno_response_from_studentintervention_ongoing
AdmissionConsiderationLevel
CEDS v12 PostsecondaryAdmissionConsiderationLevel, the degree to which a given factor is considered in an institution's admissions process. AI admissions agents must correctly classify each evaluation factor using these exact CEDS values.
Workflow area: Admissions & Enrollment Management
- OTel attribute
education.admission.consideration_level- Permitted values
requiredrecommendedneither_required_recommendeddont_know
AdmissionDecisionType
Admissions decision type. AI admissions agents may recommend but must not autonomously issue binding admissions decisions, all final decisions require HITL review under EU AI Act Article 14 and institutional policy.
Workflow area: Admissions & Enrollment Management
- OTel attribute
education.admission.decision_type- First 8 permitted values
admitadmit_conditionaladmit_waitlistdeferdenywithdraw_by_applicantincomplete_pendingadmit_with_scholarship
EnrollmentFunnelStage
Enrollment management funnel stage for a prospective or admitted student. AI enrollment management agents use this to personalise outreach, predict melt risk, and prioritise counsellor follow-up.
Workflow area: Admissions & Enrollment Management
- OTel attribute
education.enrollment.funnel_stage- First 8 permitted values
inquiryprospectapplicantadmitteddepositedconfirmed_enrolledregistered_for_classesmelted_after_deposit
TransferCreditEvaluationOutcome
Outcome of an AI-assisted transfer credit evaluation. AI transfer articulation agents recommend equivalencies; final decisions for non-direct equivalencies must be reviewed by a faculty member or registrar.
Workflow area: Admissions & Enrollment Management
- OTel attribute
education.transfer_credit.evaluation_outcome- Permitted values
direct_equivalency_grantedelective_credit_grantedno_credit_grantedpending_faculty_reviewpartial_credit_grantedcredit_in_progress_not_evaluatedforeign_credential_evaluation_required
StudentActivityStatus
IMS Global LTI Advantage Assignment and Grade Services (AGS) 2.0 activity completion status. These values must be used exactly when AI learning tools post activity status to the LMS via the AGS 2.0 lineItem endpoint.
Workflow area: Learning Activity & Assessment (LTI / AGS)
- OTel attribute
education.activity.status- Permitted values
not_startedstartedin_progresscompletedrequires_manual_inputoverdueexcused
AGSGradingProgress
IMS Global AGS 2.0 GradingProgress enum, the grading workflow state for a submission. AI auto-grading agents must use these exact values when posting scores to the LMS lineItem.
Workflow area: Learning Activity & Assessment (LTI / AGS)
- OTel attribute
education.activity.grading_progress- Permitted values
FullyGradedPendingPendingManualFailedNotReady
CaliperEventType
IMS Global Caliper Analytics v1.2 event type taxonomy. AI learning analytics agents consume Caliper events from the LMS to build engagement models. These event types must be used when publishing or consuming Caliper event streams.
Workflow area: Learning Activity & Assessment (LTI / AGS)
- OTel attribute
education.caliper.event_type- First 8 permitted values
AnnotationEventAssessmentEventAssessmentItemEventAssignableEventFeedbackEventForumEventGradeEventMediaEvent
LearningOutcomeMasteryLevel
AI adaptive learning agent classification of a student's demonstrated mastery of a learning outcome. Used to drive adaptive content sequencing and competency-based progression decisions.
Workflow area: Learning Activity & Assessment (LTI / AGS)
- OTel attribute
education.learning_outcome.mastery_level- Permitted values
not_attemptedbeginningdevelopingapproaching_masterymasteryadvanced_mastery
AIAcademicIntegrityFlag
AI-assisted work and academic integrity status flag for a student submission. Reflects both AI detection output and student self-disclosure. Institutions must not use AI detection scores alone as evidence of a violation, these flags must trigger human review processes.
Workflow area: Academic Integrity & AI-Assisted Work
- OTel attribute
education.ai_integrity.flag- Permitted values
not_flaggedai_assistance_declaredai_assistance_suspectedintegrity_violation_under_reviewconfirmed_violationcleared
This page uses the vocabulary JSON distributed with the documentation. Check its version when comparing it with an installed SDK.
Download the vocabulary JSON for offline review or automated comparisons.
Use the SDK reference for configuration and supported APIs. Keep vocabulary selection separate from the compliance team's assessment of applicable requirements.