Governance Trends
Governance Trends helps you read policy posture over time instead of judging a single session in isolation. Use the 7, 30, and 90 day views to spot degradation, compare applications, and separate short-term noise from real control failures.
This page is especially useful for recurring reviews and board-level updates. It shows how to turn trend lines into follow-up actions and stronger evidence.
Governance Trends
Governance trend analysis is the practice of examining how your AI governance posture changes over time — not just whether a single session passed or failed, but whether your systems are getting better or worse at governance, and at what rate. This guide explains how to read trend data effectively and integrate it into your governance review cadence.
Opening the Trends View
Navigate to Analytics → Trends. By default, it shows the last 30 days for all active applications.
Key controls:
- Date range — use 7 days for tactical investigation (model changes, prompt updates), 30 days for weekly governance reviews, 90 days for quarterly reporting
- Application filter — compare specific applications or isolate a single system
- Metric selector — choose which metrics to overlay (governance score, risk distribution, guardrail activity, anchor coverage)
Interpreting Governance Score Trends
What healthy looks like
A healthy governance score trend for a stable, well-instrumented application shows:
- A score in the 80–95 range with low day-to-day variance
- Gradual upward movement over weeks as instrumentation coverage improves
- Brief dips (3–7 days) after model updates, followed by recovery
Recognizing concerning patterns
| Pattern | Likely cause | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|
| Sudden step-down (score drops ≥ 10 points in 24 hours) | Model update, major prompt change, or instrumentation regression | Compare sessions before/after in Cohort view; check SDK health |
| Gradual decline (steady downward slope over 2–4 weeks) | Reduced annotation coverage — new code paths missing instrumentation | Review Coverage tab in Application workspace; check which annotations are declining |
| High variance (erratic daily swings) | Low session volume making the moving average sensitive to individual sessions, or inconsistent intent classification | Increase evaluation window; check intent label consistency in Vocabulary Browser |
| Plateau at low score (stuck below 70 for extended periods) | Systematic instrumentation gap — a major annotation type is consistently absent | Open the Governance Coverage tab; follow instrumentation guide to address the lowest-coverage dimension |
Governance Score vs. Risk Distribution
Governance score and risk distribution are complementary signals — read them together:
- High governance score + low CRITICAL/HIGH rate = strong governance program, sessions are well-governed and low-risk
- High governance score + high CRITICAL/HIGH rate = strong governance program, but the application is handling inherently risky interactions — review whether risk classification is calibrated correctly
- Low governance score + low CRITICAL/HIGH rate = governance controls are present but underperforming; instrumentation coverage likely needs improvement
- Low governance score + high CRITICAL/HIGH rate = highest-priority governance improvement area; escalate to the responsible team
Using Trends in Regulatory Reporting
Many governance frameworks require evidence of continual improvement — not just a snapshot of current posture, but a demonstrated trend over time.
For EU AI Act Article 9 (post-market monitoring)
Export the governance score time series for all applications in scope for a given period. The export from the Analytics Trends view can be attached as evidence of your post-market monitoring system.
For ISO 42001 Clause 9.1 (performance evaluation)
The 90-day governance score chart with the fleet target line overlaid is a direct artifact for the monitoring, measurement, analysis, and evaluation requirement. Caption it with your target, the period covered, and your assessment of trend direction.
For SOC 2 CC7 (system operations)
The guardrail activity trend — blocked events over time — demonstrates that operational controls were active throughout the audit period.
Save a permalink (bookmark the URL after setting your filters) to the standard trend view you use in each reporting cycle. This creates a repeatable, consistent view for governance committee presentations.
Setting Trend Alerts
Rather than manually checking the Trends view on a schedule, configure alert rules to notify you when trends cross thresholds:
- Score regression alert — fires when the rolling 7-day score drops ≥ 10 points in 48 hours
- Score below target — fires when the rolling average stays below your configured target for 24 consecutive hours
- Anchor coverage drop — fires when anchor rate drops below 98%
See Policy Rule Templates for pre-built rules for each of these scenarios.
Related Documentation
Full Analytics workspace including Trends, Cohort Comparison, Cost, and Models views.
AnalyticsConfigure automated notifications for governance score degradation.
Alert RulesHow VeriProof computes the governance score — dimensions, weights, and calibration.
Governance ScoringUsing the Compliance Center alongside the Trends view for end-to-end governance monitoring.
Compliance Monitoring